journal of cancer treatment and diagnosis predatory
At the same time, if there is a lack of awareness of predatory journals among scientists, then they will evaluate those publications as if they were legitimate and may naively send papers to predatory journals. Likewise, Cabells blacklist and whitelist, now referred to as predatory journals and analytics https://blog.cabells.com/2020/06/08/announcement/, listed more than 12,000 predatory journals in October 2019 (https://blog.cabells.com/2019/10/02/the-journal-blacklist-surpasses-the-12000-journals-listed-mark/). The influx of predatory publishing along with the substantial increase in the number of predatory journals pose a risk to scholarly communication [ 1, 2 ]. Predatory journals often lack an appropriate peer-review process and frequently are not indexed [ 3 ], yet authors are required to pay an article processing charge. However, significant differences have been found between large publishers (publishing more than 100 journals) that charge an average fee of 796$ and the publishers of a single journal that charge an average fee of 83$ (Shen and Bjork, 2015). This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The APC in JCR-indexed MDPI-journals (from 1000CHF to 2000 CHF) needs to be contextualized. Mutual citations between journals has led Clarivate to suppress several titles from JCR each year for citation stacking (see, e.g. These results showed that the MDPI journals under analysis fitted some features of the definition of predatory journals (Grudniewicz et al. https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing. The size of the editorial board is remarkably higher in all 53-MDPI journals analysed than in control leading journals. (n=169). In patients with hormone receptorpositive early-stage breast cancer, adjuvant endocrine treatment administered for up to 5-10 years after diagnosis significantly reduces the risk of recurrence and death. As the above results show, the review periods for all JCR-indexed MDPI-journals are similar and are commonly shorter than considered normal, despite the variation in number of published articles and themes. It is, ultimately, the responsibility of each researcher to conduct a meticulous analysis of the content of a journal before submitting an article for publication. Clarivate's Journal Citation Reports (JCR), a reference for the assessment of researchers and for grant-making decisions, is used as a standard whitelist, in so far as the selectivity of a JCR-indexed journal adds a legitimacy of sorts to the articles that the journal publishes. ghttps://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/engineering/journals/fast-publication-in-process-and-industrial-engineering. being able to get an erection sometimes, but not every time you want to have sex. The average increase in the number of published articles was 148.93%. In any case, the first step towards identifying predatory journals is to have a clear definition for their definitive identification. First, a proper systematic and structured overview of APC rates it is not available. One hundred and eighty-eight participants (55 women (29.2%), 128 men (68.1%)) completed the questionnaire. 's (2019) definition. The list of criteria was created after considering which information could be objectively collected and compared across journals and which may fit the suggestion by the above sources that predatory journals do not follow best publication practices. Do you read scientific literature (Original Articles, Reviews, )? dhttps://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/materials-science/journals/fast-publication. Problems and challenges of predatory journals, Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references, A study of innovative features in scholarly open access journals, Authors beware! 2020). The increase in APCs was qualified as hyperinflation by Khoo (2019) and was not exclusive to MDPI, as in his study, which covered 319 journals of the four-largest APC-funded open-access publishersHindawi, Frontiers, MDPI, and BioMed Central Ltd. (BMC)between 2012 and 2018, he found overall APC rises in all of them ranging between 17% and 220% and, likewise, observed a rise in the number of articles per journal. The Swedish Childhood Tumor Biobank (BTB) is a nonprofit national infrastructure for collecting tissue samples and genomic data from pediatric patients diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS) and other solid tumors. Citation analysis used for citation manipulation is a form of misconduct and does not fit best editorial practices (a feature of predatory journals mentioned in Grudniewicz et al. *Follow-up question, total number of answers out of all possible answers are given in brackets. The alarming increase in the number of predatory journals (from 1,800 to 8,000 over the period 20104) and the exponential growth (from 53,000 to 420,000 between 2010 and 2014) of the articles that they publish (Shen and Bjork 2015) have rendered futile any effort to keep white and blacklists updated. because it is used as a proxy for both quality and integrity. It may therefore be appreciated that the reputation of MDPI Publisher has undergone ups and downs over the past few years and has both its critics and supporters, which makes it an interesting case study. As such the question arises whether or not this speed is achieved with a thorough peer review in line with editorial and publishing best practices or if the rigor and quality of the peer review process is compromised in order to achieve these speeds. Do you receive invitations by journals to contribute an article (Orig. being able to get an erection sometimes, but not every time you want to have sex. They are, in all, a threat to society as a whole, because whenever the articles that they publish are indexed in selective databases, which is the case of PubMed, the items achieve global exposure and are interpreted by readers, including patients, as trustworthy (Manca et al. Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies One hundred and forty-three (76.1%) participants stated that peer review was the most important factor, followed by a high-impact factor (n=133, 70.7%) and good indexing (n=98, 52.1%) to consider a journal for publication. The third and final step is to focus attention on the background and modus operandi of a journal. 2019) and therefore jeopardize integrity in science. Dedicated educational initiatives are needed to raise awareness of this problem and to aid in the identification of predatory journals for the scientific oncology community. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2019) clarified that predatory publishing generally refers to the systematic for-profit publication of purportedly scholarly content (in journals and articles, monographs, books, or conference proceedings) in a deceptive or fraudulent way and without any regard for quality assurance [ so] these journals exist solely for profit without any commitment to publication ethics or integrity of any kind. The process of journal identification, inclusion, and exclusions within each study group is outlined in Fig. Here, we tried to survey its potential impact on the field of oncology. As depicted in Figure 5, the impact factors of all journals were reduced when self-citations were removed. MDPI founder and current president is Shu-Kun Lin, Ph.D (https://www.mdpi.com/about/team). 2020). Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany, 10 The lack of content analysis is a limitation of this study and could be performed in future research with a random sample of articles published in JCR-indexed MDPI-journals in line with Step 2 proposed by Kratochvl et al. In addition, it is highly unusual to have an article accepted without revisions. The APCs published on the journal web pages of the 53 journals under analysis imply that the articles published in 2019 could have generated an approximate income of 153,834,500 CHF (no APC-related waiver or discount could be considered in this calculation as no JCR-indexed journal provides relevant detailed information on the topic). In 2018, the case of the International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Sustainability, with self-citation rates several times higher than those of the leading journals within the same category stands out (a difference of 25.17% and 16.98%, respectively). 3rd Medical Department, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria, 5 K. D., Bryson, G. L., Cukier, S., Allen, K., Arden, C., Balcom, L., Barros, T., Berger, M., Buitrago Ciro, J., Cugusi, L., Donaldson, M. R., Matthias, E., Graham, I. D., Hodgkinson, M., Khan, K. M., Mabizela, M., Manca, A., Milzow, K., Mouton, J., Muchenje, M., Olijhoek, T., Ommaya, A., Patwardhan, B., Poff, D., Proulx, L., Rodger, M., Severin, A., Strinzel, M., Sylos-Labini, M., Tamblyn, R., van Niekerk, M., Wicherts, J.M., Lalu, G. M. Predatory Journals: No Definition, No Defence, Predatory Publishing: An Emerging Threat to the Medical Literatura, Predatory Publishing Dilutes and Distorts Evidence in Systemactic Reviews, Payouts Push Professors towards Predatory Journals, From Excessive Journal Self-Cites to Citation Stacking: Analysis of Journal Self-Citation Kinetics in Search for Journals, Which Boost Their Scientometric Indicators, A Users Guide to Inflated and Manipulated Impact Factors, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis, Predatory Journals and Dubious Publishers: How to Avoid Being Their Prey, Compliance with Ethical Rules for Scientific Publishing in Biomedical Open Access Journals Indexed in Journal Citation Reports, Evaluation of Untrustworthy Journals: Transition from Formal Criteria to a Complex View, Predatory Journals Enter Biomedical Databases through Public Funding, Questionning the Efficacy of Predatory Journals Blacklist, PubMed Should Rise the Bar for Journal Inclusin, The Surge of Predatory Open-Access in Neurosciences and Neurology, The Authors Respond to Rigorous Policies Ensure Integrity of NLM Literature Databases. 2018). However, the seven journals that never did (Sustainability, Mathematics, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Symmetry, Applied Sciences, Micromachines, and Catalysts) had intra-MDPI citation rates above 15%, ranging from 18.73% in Catalysts to 46.55% in Sustainability (Table 3). Certainly, the present survey faces a geographical limitation as only medical oncologists from Germany and Austria were invited to participate. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide, This PDF is available to Subscribers Only. Therefore, we aimed to explore the awareness of predatory journals among oncologists. 2020) for inclusion in an objective definition. In particular, the 400 or so conferences that MDPI sponsored in 2019 (MDPI 2020) should all be carefully scrutinized. h-index) of their authors, generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers (Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a). Epidemiology. Awareness of predatory journals did not correlate with gender (p=0.515) or translation of scientific literature into clinical practice (p=0.543). As indicators of their objectives and strategy, this study analysed journals' behavior in relation to the following measures: similarity of journal name, content output, APCs, frequency of publication, editorial board size, peer review process (particularly peer review time as peer review is the most common procedure to assure published manuscript quality), journal Impact Factor, and self-citation (due to its direct impact on journals' reputation metrics).
How Often Should You Replace Mattress Topper,
Weber Traveler Portable Propane Gas Grill - Black 9010001,
6v 7ah Battery Near Singapore,
Wet Wipes Manufacturing Cost,
Ariba Guided Buying Implementationextra Sharp Provolone,
Articles J